Carbon-14 dating does not produce ages in the millions of years, as do some other types of radioisotope dating.C dating consists of measuring the amounts of carbon-14 and carbon-12, and sometimes C-13, in a sample.Beyond that timespan, the amount of the original C formed by irradiation of nitrogen by neutrons from the spontaneous fission of uranium, present in trace quantities almost everywhere.For these samples, other dating methods must be used.Worse still, sometimes they want to know how evolutionists use Carbon-14 to date dinosaur fossils!Radiometric Dating Technologies are presented to the public by evolutionists as utterly reliable clocks for dating earth rocks or biological materials.

It is sometimes thought possible to extend the dating range a few half-lives, so one occasionally sees dates as old as 70,000 years or more.These include the starting conditions, the constancy of the rate of decay, and that no material has left or entered the sample.Furthermore, if a sample has been contaminated, scientists will know about it.There are more than 80 such technologies that are claimed to work.Prior to looking at the many flaws in the Carbon-14 Dating Technique, it should be noted that no radiometric technique is reliable.Briefly, normal carbon is carbon-12 (C atoms are incorporated, along with normal carbon atoms, into the cellulose structure of plants and trees, and they also enter into the tissues of animals.When a plant or animal dies, no more carbon is added.For some reason, which I have not yet figured out, at least one person per week has been asking me about the Carbon-14 Radiometric Dating Technique.They want to know if it is accurate or if it works at all.A favorite tactic of Young-Earthers involves citing studies which show trace amounts of Indeed, this results from a unique decay mode known as "cluster decay" where a given isotope emits a particle heavier than an alpha particle (radium-226 is an example.) This fact is extremely inconvenient and creationist literature, accordingly, usually does not mention it.Carbon-dating Carbon dating, like other radiometric dating methods, requires certain assumptions that cannot be scientifically proved.He gives the example of the Dead Sea Scrolls, the linen wrappings of which were dated to between 150 B. I could find no evidence of it, until I considered the source of the claim.He is, of course, referring to young earth scientists who tested material that contains C, there are numerous ones that are truly "carbon-14 dead." Based on his explanation, as you will see, any dead layers invalidate his conclusion at the end of this chapter.He claimed that it was capable of dating animal, plant and human remains of fairly “recent’ origin. As they say on Star Trek, we are all carbon based units.Laboratory research has shown that the radioactive decay of Carbon-14 occurs in a half-life of 5,73040 years through beta decay that causes the Carbon-14 to revert back to Nitrogen-14.